[Index]
Julia WARKE (1858 - 1909)
Children Self + Spouses Parents Grandparents Greatgrandparents
Julia WARKE (1858 - 1909)

+

John Thomas LOCKWOOD BIRKIN (1859 - 1915)

John Michael CURLEY
Alexander WARKE











Jane MCKAY












b. 1858 at Majorca, Victoria, Australia
m. (1) 1882 John Thomas LOCKWOOD BIRKIN (1859 - 1915)
m. (2) 1888 John Michael CURLEY at Victoria, Australia
d. 1909 at Kew, Victoria, Australia aged 51
Near Relatives of Julia WARKE (1858 - 1909)
Relationship Person Born Birth Place Died Death Place Age
Father in Law Richard LOCKWOOD abt 1836 Suffolk, England 1910 Dunedin, New Zealand 74
Mother in Law Elizabeth GARDINER 1843 Launceston, Tasmania, Australia 1916 Sandringham, Victoria, Australia 73

Father Alexander WARKE
Mother Jane MCKAY

Self Julia WARKE 1858 Majorca, Victoria, Australia 1909 Kew, Victoria, Australia 51

Husband John Thomas LOCKWOOD BIRKIN 1859 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1915 Newport, Victoria, Australia 56
Husband John Michael CURLEY

Step Son Frederick George Lockwood BIRKIN 1896 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1916 Villers Bretonneux, France 20
Step Son Henry 'Harry' Lockwood BIRKIN 1897 Williamstown, Victoria, Australia 1970 Victoria, Australia 73
Step Daughter Jean Amy "Bonny" BIRKIN 1900 Williamstown, Victoria, Australia 1968 Victoria, Australia 68
Step Son Alfred Thomas Lockwood BIRKIN 1903 Williamstown, Victoria, Australia 1959 Windsor, Victoria, Australia 56

Nephew Alfred BIRKIN 1884 Kensington Hill, Victoria, Australia 1946 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 62
Niece Agnes (Aggie) Isabella BIRKIN 1885 Victoria, Australia 1973 Perth, WA, Australia 88
Niece Inez BIRKIN 1901 Albury, NSW, Australia

Brother in Law James MASTERTON
Sister in Law Jennet (?? Isabella) MASTERTON bef 1935
Sister in Law Isabella MASTERTON 1859 1881 Cohuna, Victoria, Australia 22
Brother in Law Henry LOCKWOOD BIRKIN 1862 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1938 Upwey, Victoria, Australia 76
Sister in Law Elizabeth MASTERTON abt 1863 1935 Elsternwick, Victoria, Australia 72
Sister in Law Jane White (Ginnie) MASTERTON abt 1864 Scotland 1920 Kerang, Victoria, Australia 56
Sister in Law Marian Minnie MASTERTON 1864 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1950 Cohuna, Victoria, Australia 86
Sister in Law Alexandrina MASTERTON 1868 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1958 St. Kilda, Victoria, Australia 90
Brother in Law Melville Essex BIRKIN 1884 Echuca, Victoria, Australia Possibly Zimbabwe
Brother in Law Alfred BIRKIN 1864 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1945 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 81
Brother in Law Samuel BIRKIN 1866 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1866 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 0
Sister in Law Elizabeth Sarah BIRKIN 1867 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1952 Ripponlea, Victoria 85
Sister in Law Amy Joanna BIRKIN 1869 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1870 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1
Brother in Law George Walter Gardner BIRKIN 1871 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1895 Coolgardie, Western Australia, Australia 24
Brother in Law Alexander Joseph BIRKIN 1873 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1926 South Yarra, Victoria, Australia 53
Brother in Law William Jesse BIRKIN 1873 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1947 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 74
Sister in Law Beatrice Ellen BIRKIN 1876 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1960 Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 84
Brother in Law Charles Laurence Ducane BIRKIN 1877 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1931 Fremantle, WA, Australia 54
Sister in Law Ruth Charlotte BIRKIN 1879 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1914 Victoria, Australia 35
Brother in Law James St Patrick Moss BIRKIN 1880 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1951 Perth, WA, Australia 71
Sister in Law Alice Victoria BIRKIN 1881 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia
Sister in Law Edith Cameron BIRKIN 1886 Kyneton, Victoria, Australia 1945 Esperance, Western Australia, Australia 59
Events in Julia WARKE (1858 - 1909)'s life
Date Age Event Place Notes Src
1858 Julia WARKE was born Majorca, Victoria, Australia Note 1 22
1882 24 Married John Thomas LOCKWOOD BIRKIN (aged 23) Note 2 22
1886 28 Other Event Note 3 60
1888 30 Married John Michael CURLEY Victoria, Australia Note 4 52
1909 51 Julia WARKE died Kew, Victoria, Australia Note 5 22
Note 1: WARKE Julia
Birth
Mother - Jane MCKEY
Father - Alexander
Place of birth - MCCULLUMS
1858
14501/1858
Note 2: BIRKINJohn Thomas
Marriage
WARKE, Julia
1882
3986/1882
Note 3: The Herald (Melbourne) 17 August 1886
THE DIVORCE COURT.
BIRKIN v. BIRK1N.
In this suit Julia Birkin, the petitioner,
sought to have her marriage with John Thomas
Birkin, dissolved on the ground of misconduct
and cruelty.
Dr Dobson, instructed by Messrs M'Kean
and Leonard, was for the petitioner.
There was no appearance for the respon
dent.
James M'Kean, attorney for the petitioner,
gave evidence of the service of the petition on
Mr Justice Williams and tlie Attorney-Gene
ral,
Ralph Low, clerk in tho Registrar General's
office, produced a certificate of the marriage
between John Thomas Burkin and Julia
Warke, on 21st August, 1882.
Henry Warke, brother of the petitioner,
proved the service of the petition and citation
on the respondent at Sydney.
Julia Birkin, the petitioner, who is 23 years
of age, and was born at Majorca said she was
married to the respondent, John Thomas
Birkin, at Echuca on 21st August 1882, by the
Rev John Johnstone.,Presbyterian minister.
Immediately after the marriage they went
to Goldsbrough, and afterwards to
Kyneton, remaining about two months
at each place. Her husband, who
was away frequently, was a sheep drover.
She knew a woman named Mary Strong. She
had a conversation with her husband
about her at Kyneton about six weeks
after the marriage. He admitted a previous
Improper intimacy with this woman,
after this they went to Sandhurst. The
respondent got intoxicated at the refreshment
rooms, and he started beating her on the
station before all the passengers. He hit
her across the head and threw her against the
station. She reproached him for his conduct.
He got worse, so she went home to her
mother's, at Echuca. He remained at Sand
hurst. She remained with her mother one
night, and then returned home to
Kyneton, Her husband was not there.
When they left Kyneton for Sandhurst it was
only for a trip. She enquired about her hus
band at Kyneton, and could not hear of him
so she returned to her mother's at Echuca, re
maining three months. During this titme she
did not see her Husband, but heard that he had
passed through with sheep. There she took
out a warrant for his arrest for deserting her,
but she did not prosecute the matter. She
remembered her husband coming to her
mother's house about June, 1883. He beat
her, tore up her clothes, blackened her eyes,
cut her lip, dashed her on the floor, and bruised
her all over. She was attended by Drs
Murdoch and Osborne She was in bed for
over a week in consequence of his treatment.
He returned again, intoxicated, on the
same day and wished her to go out
for a drive with him, but she would not.
Then he produced a penknife and wished to cut
her throat. He also beat her until she was
rescued by some people. Then she went
to stay with her sister at Footscray. Before
this she brought him up on summons, and he
was bound over to keep the peace. She stayed
at Footscray for a week and returned
to Echuca. One morning he came
about five o'clock and pulled her out of
bed in her nightdress, and carried her down to
the Campaspie, saying he was going to drown
her. Her brother and some other friend went
after her and made him let her go.
Dr Dobson : How far had be carried you ?
Petitioner : Over half a mile. She did
not think she had seen him since.
The letter produced was in her husband's
writing. (It was dated 25th August, 1885
from Sydney, and stated that he was living
with a woman.) She went over to Sydney,
and in company with a man named James
Piles she went to a house in Sydney. They
broke into a room at night, and
found the respondent in company with
Mary Strong. Jamen Piles was a groom at
the George hotel. They had been unable to
find him. She had not lived with her husband
since 1882, and she received no maintenance
from him since.
Henry Warke recalled, said he first saw
Mary Strong in Echuca, at the beginning of
1883. He believed she was a dressmaker.
When he went to Sydney he saw her sitting on
the respondent's verandah with him. He heard
a child crying in the house The date of the
attempted drowning would be in 1883. It was
just breaking day in the summer time. Incon
sequence of what his mother said he went after
Burkin and his sister. He had great
trouble to get her away. She was
attired in her night-dress. They were over
half a mile away before he came up. The
respondent was sober. He said he was going to
drown her. The witness said he should not,
and he and several other managed to get her
away and bring her home. She was very much
exhausted.
Ethel Goss, a friend of Mrs Birkin, recollected
the month of June, 1883. The respondent came
to the house of Mrs Birkin s mother, broke
the furniture, knocked things about, and beat
his wife. The witness interfered to prevent
him illtreating his wife, and he then threat
ened her. After the attempted drowning,
when she remonstrated with the respondent,
he said he was going to give his wife a cool
bath and drown her. The same day he
came with a buggy and pair iintoxicated
and wanted her to go out for a drive.
Upon her refusing, he started thrashing her
with the whip. Subsequently he beat her and
the witness found her lying on the floor help
less, black in the face, complaining that her
was broken.
Dr. Dobon submitted that the petitioner's
case had been established.
His Honor had no doubt of the misconduct.
The evidence of cruelty was not so strong as it
should be ; but, coupled with the desertion,
he considered the proofs were sufficient, and
granted a decree nisi.
Decree nisi for dissolution of marriage
Note 4: Lavinia Julia Warke
in the Australia, Marriage Index, 1788-1950
Name Lavinia Julia Warke
Marriage Date 1888
Marriage Place Victoria
Registration Date 1888
Registration Place Victoria, Australia
Spouse John Michael Curley
Registration Number 1303
Note 5: CURLEY Julia Levina
Death
Mother - Jane MCKAY
Father - , Warke Alex
Kew
Age 44
1909
9126/1909
Source References:
22. Type: Vital Record, Abbr: Victoria bdm index, Title: Victorian bdm
- Reference = (Marriage)
- Notes: BIRKINJohn Thomas
Marriage
WARKE, Julia
1882
3986/1882
- Reference = (Death)
- Notes: CURLEY Julia Levina
Death
Mother - Jane MCKAY
Father - , Warke Alex
Kew
Age 44
1909
9126/1909
- Reference = (Birth)
- Notes: WARKE Julia
Birth
Mother - Jane MCKEY
Father - Alexander
Place of birth - MCCULLUMS
1858
14501/1858
52. Type: Australia Birth Marriage Death Index 1787 - 1985 Record
- Reference = (Marriage)
- Notes: Lavinia Julia Warke
in the Australia, Marriage Index, 1788-1950
Name Lavinia Julia Warke
Marriage Date 1888
Marriage Place Victoria
Registration Date 1888
Registration Place Victoria, Australia
Spouse John Michael Curley
Registration Number 1303
60. Type: Newspaper, Title: Trove, http://trove.nla.gov.au
- Reference = (Other Event)
- Notes: THE DIVORCE COURT.
BIRKIN v. BIRK1N.
In this suit Julia Birkin, the petitioner,
sought to have her marriage with John Thomas
Birkin, dissolved on the ground of misconduct
and cruelty.
Dr Dobson, instructed by Messrs M'Kean
and Leonard, was for the petitioner.
There was no appearance for the respon
dent.
James M'Kean, attorney for the petitioner,
gave evidence of the service of the petition on
Mr Justice Williams and tlie Attorney-Gene
ral,
Ralph Low, clerk in tho Registrar General's
office, produced a certificate of the marriage
between John Thomas Burkin and Julia
Warke, on 21st August, 1882.
Henry Warke, brother of the petitioner,
proved the service of the petition and citation
on the respondent at Sydney.
Julia Birkin, the petitioner, who is 23 years
of age, and was born at Majorca said she was
married to the respondent, John Thomas
Birkin, at Echuca on 21st August 1882, by the
Rev John Johnstone.,Presbyterian minister.
Immediately after the marriage they went
to Goldsbrough, and afterwards to
Kyneton, remaining about two months
at each place. Her husband, who
was away frequently, was a sheep drover.
She knew a woman named Mary Strong. She
had a conversation with her husband
about her at Kyneton about six weeks
after the marriage. He admitted a previous
Improper intimacy with this woman,
after this they went to Sandhurst. The
respondent got intoxicated at the refreshment
rooms, and he started beating her on the
station before all the passengers. He hit
her across the head and threw her against the
station. She reproached him for his conduct.
He got worse, so she went home to her
mother's, at Echuca. He remained at Sand
hurst. She remained with her mother one
night, and then returned home to
Kyneton, Her husband was not there.
When they left Kyneton for Sandhurst it was
only for a trip. She enquired about her hus
band at Kyneton, and could not hear of him
so she returned to her mother's at Echuca, re
maining three months. During this titme she
did not see her Husband, but heard that he had
passed through with sheep. There she took
out a warrant for his arrest for deserting her,
but she did not prosecute the matter. She
remembered her husband coming to her
mother's house about June, 1883. He beat
her, tore up her clothes, blackened her eyes,
cut her lip, dashed her on the floor, and bruised
her all over. She was attended by Drs
Murdoch and Osborne She was in bed for
over a week in consequence of his treatment.
He returned again, intoxicated, on the
same day and wished her to go out
for a drive with him, but she would not.
Then he produced a penknife and wished to cut
her throat. He also beat her until she was
rescued by some people. Then she went
to stay with her sister at Footscray. Before
this she brought him up on summons, and he
was bound over to keep the peace. She stayed
at Footscray for a week and returned
to Echuca. One morning he came
about five o'clock and pulled her out of
bed in her nightdress, and carried her down to
the Campaspie, saying he was going to drown
her. Her brother and some other friend went
after her and made him let her go.
Dr Dobson : How far had be carried you ?
Petitioner : Over half a mile. She did
not think she had seen him since.
The letter produced was in her husband's
writing. (It was dated 25th August, 1885
from Sydney, and stated that he was living
with a woman.) She went over to Sydney,
and in company with a man named James
Piles she went to a house in Sydney. They
broke into a room at night, and
found the respondent in company with
Mary Strong. Jamen Piles was a groom at
the George hotel. They had been unable to
find him. She had not lived with her husband
since 1882, and she received no maintenance
from him since.
Henry Warke recalled, said he first saw
Mary Strong in Echuca, at the beginning of
1883. He believed she was a dressmaker.
When he went to Sydney he saw her sitting on
the respondent's verandah with him. He heard
a child crying in the house The date of the
attempted drowning would be in 1883. It was
just breaking day in the summer time. Incon
sequence of what his mother said he went after
Burkin and his sister. He had great
trouble to get her away. She was
attired in her night-dress. They were over
half a mile away before he came up. The
respondent was sober. He said he was going to
drown her. The witness said he should not,
and he and several other managed to get her
away and bring her home. She was very much
exhausted.
Ethel Goss, a friend of Mrs Birkin, recollected
the month of June, 1883. The respondent came
to the house of Mrs Birkin s mother, broke
the furniture, knocked things about, and beat
his wife. The witness interfered to prevent
him illtreating his wife, and he then threat
ened her. After the attempted drowning,
when she remonstrated with the respondent,
he said he was going to give his wife a cool
bath and drown her. The same day he
came with a buggy and pair iintoxicated
and wanted her to go out for a drive.
Upon her refusing, he started thrashing her
with the whip. Subsequently he beat her and
the witness found her lying on the floor help
less, black in the face, complaining that her
was broken.
Dr. Dobon submitted that the petitioner's
case had been established.
His Honor had no doubt of the misconduct.
The evidence of cruelty was not so strong as it
should be ; but, coupled with the desertion,
he considered the proofs were sufficient, and
granted a decree nisi.
Decree nisi for dissolution of marriage